By Ron Bachman, Chairman of Editorial Advisory Board, The Institute for HealthCare Consumerism
Who: An employer whose workforce exceeds 50 full-time employees for 120 days or fewer during a calendar year.
When: Beginning Jan. 1, 2014, employers with 50 or more full-time workers are required to provide health coverage or incur applicable penalties. At least through the end of 2014, employers may rely on the:
Employers will not be required to comply with any subsequent IRS guidance that is more restrictive until at least Jan. 1, 2015.
What: Determining the PPACA legally recognized number of full-time employees is critical to establishing compliance with aspects of PPACA requirements and exposure to certain coverage penalties.
A full-time employee with respect to any month is an employee who is employed on average at least 30 hours of service per week. To determine the number of full-time workers can be complicated.
Executive Summary: The IRS has put out guidelines for the calculation of full-time employees. It is not as easy as one might assume. In addition there are safe harbor and transition rules that apply.
There are two safe harbor options allowed when determining an employee’s full-time status:
An employer will not be subject to a penalty if the coverage offered to an employee is affordable based on the employee’s Form W-2 wages. This is often referred to as the affordability safe harbor.
In addition, use of any of the safe harbor methods described above are not required, but optional.
Actions: Employers will need to calculate the number of full-time workers related to PPACA requirements. It may be necessary to consider employment contracts and work schedules during 2013 in preparation for this 2014 requirement. Employers will need to be in compliance or incur penalties. Employers should check with their compliance and legal teams, insurance brokers, agents, consultants and insurers in preparation for the changes to be implemented in 2014.
For more details see IRS Notice 2012-58 at http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-12-58.pdf
The information presented and contained within this article was submitted by Ronald E. Bachman, President & CEO of Healthcare Vision. This information is general information only, and does not, and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You should consult your legal advisors to determine the laws and regulations impacting your business.
In the ever-increasing pages of guidance from the federal regulatory agencies responsible for implementing the Affordable Care Act (ACA), it is easy to lose track of how the new rules apply to various types of individual account-based health plans (i.e. FSAs, HRAs, and HSAs). Following is an overview of how
As health care costs in the U.S. continue to rise, employers are looking for new ways to enhance health care offerings that complement traditional insurance while providing employees with access to benefits that can increase wellness, reduce absenteeism and improve worker productivity.
Acting on his own authority, the president has again suspended the employer mandate for certain businesses until 2016. Most observers, especially those sympathetic to the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) goals, consider the president’s exercise of executive power benign. Even the Republicans have been calling for delay, so why complain about
At the December 2013 IHC FORUM West conference, I had an interesting discussion with several experts in the private exchange arena: In ten years, what will be the relationship between public and private exchanges?
Requests for permissions to reuse content contact Copyright Clearance Center at firstname.lastname@example.org